Will Lindsay Clancy be retried? The choice now going through Timothy Cruz.
Crime
After a mistrial, Timothy Cruz should resolve whether or not to retry Lindsay Clancy on first-degree homicide fees, downgrade the fees, or drop the case.
For his 25 years because the elected district legal professional of Plymouth County, a working-class district between Boston and Cape Cod in Massachusetts, Timothy Cruz has honed his fame as a hard-nosed prosecutor powerful on crime.
With that in thoughts, colleagues and others who know his strategy say they’d be shocked if he backs off his prosecution of Lindsay Clancy, even after her case resulted in a mistrial Friday, with 11 of 12 jurors showing to agree that she shouldn’t be discovered responsible of first-degree homicide.
Encircled by a thicket of cameras and microphones after the trial, Cruz declined to instantly say if he deliberate to once more strive Clancy within the killing of her three kids. However his tone and phrases didn’t recommend that he would soften his strategy.
“That is, has been and might be about getting justice,” he mentioned, invoking the reminiscence of Clancy’s kids — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and child Callan — and pledging to “make it possible for the victims should not invisible.”
Cruz, the son of a plumber who was born within the blue-collar metropolis of Brockton, Massachusetts, mentioned Friday that he would make his choice about his subsequent steps “shortly.”
Cruz has been sharply criticized by some supporters of Clancy for his choice to strive her for first-degree homicide as an alternative of crafting an strategy that acknowledged her psychological sickness and prioritized therapy over jail time. Clancy has admitted to strangling her kids. Her lawyer argued that she was experiencing psychosis on Jan. 24, 2023, and heard a hallucinated male voice that ordered her to kill them.
Throughout the trial that started in July, assistant district attorneys Jennifer Sprague and Shanan Buckingham acknowledged Clancy’s struggles with despair and nervousness after the beginning of her third youngster. However additionally they painted her as a manipulative and calculating killer who despatched her husband out on errands to purchase time to commit the murders, after which fabricated claims of psychosis to evade punishment after she survived her personal suicide try.
“She now not preferred the life that she thought she wished, and when she noticed the chance to flee, she made the egocentric option to take it,” Buckingham mentioned in her opening argument.
Robert F. Shaw, a Boston protection lawyer, mentioned the prosecution’s strategy was startling, given Clancy’s well-documented efforts earlier than the killings to seek out efficient therapy for her psychological sickness.
“If someone’s struggling to get medical assist and persistently searching for it out and clearly there’s been actual influence on psychological well being, why body it proper from the beginning as this chilly, calculating, manipulative girl?” Shaw mentioned.
Consultants mentioned that the majority prosecutors would suppose twice about retrying a case after a hung jury through which they knew a big majority opposed a responsible discovering, as appears to have been the case in Clancy’s mistrial. The expense of a second trial could also be one other deterrent. However in a case involving youngster victims that drew widespread nationwide consideration, an elected DA might really feel heavy stress to persist.
In Cruz’s case, a choice to retry Clancy on the identical cost would even be in line with his uncompromising strategy. Elliot Levine, a legal protection lawyer, referred to as Cruz’s workplace “essentially the most draconian within the state.”
“He’ll strive a case that’s possibly a shedding case,” Levine mentioned. “That manner it’s the jury’s fault however not his fault for being smooth on crime.”
Cruz has been an outspoken critic of some current legal justice reforms in progressive Massachusetts, the place he’s the one Republican among the many state’s 11 elected district attorneys. He’s working unopposed for reelection in November.
Amongst his supporters in Plymouth County, together with Hunter Younger, chair of the Plymouth Republican City Committee, there may be assist for a retrial of Clancy.
“I believe there was malice aforethought — that’s what the info appear to point out — and I believe he ought to go for it once more,” mentioned Younger, 21. “We wish justice for the kids. It’s not about her.”
Had Cruz opted for a second-degree homicide cost towards Clancy, her lawyer would have had the choice to waive a jury trial and have the case heard by a decide alone. Some see that path as extra humane for mentally in poor health defendants, or extra simply, given the complexity of madness defenses.
Sometimes, Cruz has reserved his compassion for crime victims. He forcefully criticized a 2024 choice by the state’s Supreme Judicial Court docket that barred life sentences with out parole for individuals who commit crimes earlier than age 21, and decried as “travesties” the ensuing launch of some offenders by the state parole board.
“Massachusetts was as soon as a nationwide chief in defending the rights of victims of crime,” he wrote in an editorial final 12 months. “Sadly, these days are lengthy gone.”
His management has come underneath hearth earlier than. He confronted questions a decade in the past about his gradual response to sexual harassment allegations towards his prime deputy. He was criticized for spending greater than $2 million on non-public legal professionals to struggle a wrongful termination lawsuit by a former prosecutor. And he was sued by the state’s legal professional normal for withholding public data.
In a current setback for his workplace, Cruz was ordered by the state’s highest courtroom to grant a brand new trial to Latarsha Sanders, one other Massachusetts mom who killed her kids whereas mentally in poor health, and was convicted of first-degree homicide in 2022. The courtroom discovered that her psychological well being data mustn’t have been excluded from her trial by the decide; Cruz has not but mentioned if he intends to retry her.
A seasoned outsider in a state largely run by Democrats, Cruz can nonetheless bristle at criticism. Heckled by supporters of Clancy at his information convention Friday, he snapped again. “I’m not going to face out right here and take heed to this,” he mentioned.
Requested to defend what some have referred to as his insensitive therapy of Clancy, he wasted no time turning the tables. “Insensitive?” he shot again. “Insensitive is killing three kids.”
A spokesperson for Cruz’s workplace didn’t instantly grant an interview request.
Robert Bloom, a professor of regulation at Boston School — the place Cruz earned his undergraduate diploma and performed hockey — mentioned the prosecutor’s full-bore strategy might mirror an insistence on evenhandedness. His district ranges from elite coastal enclaves like Duxbury, Massachusetts, the place the Clancys lived, to blue-collar cities like his native Brockton.
“By way of working-class voters, you’ve bought to say: We’re treating somebody from Duxbury the identical manner we’re treating somebody from Brockton,” mentioned Bloom.
Voters have responded, in a politically combined county the place President Donald Trump received greater than a dozen cities within the 2024 election. The final time Cruz was reelected, in 2022, he received 63% of the vote, simply defeating his progressive challenger.
Sally King, a longtime Plymouth resident who attended Clancy’s trial, mentioned she wouldn’t vote for Cruz in November. King, who described herself as a “conservative Democrat” who has supported leaders from each events, mentioned she could be “infuriated” if the district legal professional have been to retry Clancy on the identical fees.
“When you’ve got 11 jurors who agreed on madness?” she mentioned. “There isn’t a justice there.”
This text initially appeared in The New York Instances.
Boston.com Tonight
Signal as much as obtain the most recent headlines in your inbox, each evening.
