Prosecutors sought grand jury testimony by L.A. metropolis councilman’s spouse

L.A. County prosecutors tried to drive Metropolis Councilman Curren Value’s spouse to testify earlier than a grand jury and served subpoenas on a number of members of his Metropolis Corridor employees earlier this yr, three sources informed The Instances.

The grand jury was convened in March, in line with three sources who spoke on the situation of anonymity as a result of grand jury proceedings are secret beneath California regulation. Value’s lawyer, Michael Schafler, additionally confirmed the existence of a grand jury continuing in a brand new court docket submitting on Thursday.

The convening of a grand jury, coupled with information that prosecutors filed further prices towards Value earlier this week, marks a big uptick within the district lawyer’s workplace’s deal with the veteran councilman. Value was first charged in 2023 after voting in favor of a number of measures that prosecutors allege would financially profit his spouse, actual property advisor Del Richardson.

Paperwork made public Thursday additionally present the district lawyer’s workplace thought of Richardson a “suspect” within the legal investigation into her husband as not too long ago as 2022.

The councilman has denied all wrongdoing and pleaded not responsible.

Richardson in the end didn’t testify earlier than the grand jury, although it was not clear why, in line with two of the sources. No legal prices have been filed towards Richardson. The district lawyer’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to questions on that call Thursday.

“I might not anticipate Del Richardson to be charged as a result of she has performed nothing unsuitable,” mentioned Richardson’s lawyer, Adam Kamenstein. “She can also be fully assured that her husband, Councilman Value, will quickly be absolutely vindicated, and she or he appears ahead to with the ability to put this matter behind them.”

Value now faces 12 legal counts in whole accusing him of grand theft by embezzlement, perjury and violating state battle of curiosity legal guidelines. Prosecutors allege Value repeatedly voted in favor of measures to promote buildings or help grants for builders or companies that had beforehand contracted along with his spouse’s consulting agency, Del Richardson & Associates.

Value has additionally been accused of bilking the town out of $33,000 in medical premiums by itemizing his spouse as a beneficiary of his city-issued healthcare plan between 2013 and 2017, earlier than they have been legally married.

In paperwork made public Thursday morning, a abstract of the district lawyer’s workplace’s investigation written in 2022 described Richardson as a “suspect” within the case.

An investigator wrote that Richardson dedicated perjury and aided and abetted in Value’s alleged embezzlement by in search of to recoup healthcare prices from the town of Inglewood, the place Value previously served as a councilman, between 2015 and 2017, in line with the abstract doc. Value and Richardson weren’t legally married on the time as Value didn’t divorce his first spouse till 2018, prosecutors allege.

Prosecutors served subpoenas on a number of members of Value’s Metropolis Corridor employees and a number of other former workers of Del Richardson & Associates, which Richardson bought to the Greenwood Seneca Basis a number of years in the past, the sources mentioned.

The aim of the grand jury was additionally unclear, as two of the sources mentioned questions requested by prosecutors weren’t targeted on the fees already filed towards Value.

In a movement in search of to dismiss all prices filed Thursday morning, Schafler questioned the legality of the grand jury proceedings.

Schafler mentioned the grand jury hearings “seem to impermissibly have been for the first objective of discovery and making ready for the preliminary listening to and trial on this motion, which had already been pending since June 2023.”

Grand juries are held in secret and transcripts of such proceedings solely turn out to be public if an indictment is returned towards the goal of the listening to. Value has not been indicted.

The district lawyer’s workplace mentioned it couldn’t touch upon grand jury proceedings with out court docket authorization.

“The Grand Jury course of includes two varieties of Grand Juries: Investigative and Indicting. An Investigative Grand Jury investigates and doesn’t search an Indictment,” the workplace mentioned in a press release.

It was not clear which sort of grand jury was convened in Value’s case. It’s uncommon for prosecutors to fail to persuade a grand jury to return an indictment.

In a movement in search of to dismiss prices in 2023, Value’s lawyer argued prosecutors couldn’t show that previous funds to Richardson’s firm had any affect on the councilman’s voting document. Most of the votes that prosecutors zeroed in on handed simply, with Value’s vote making no distinction to their success or failure.

Underneath California regulation, legal circumstances can proceed from the submitting of prices to a trial by two pathways. Most of the time, defendants face a preliminary listening to the place a choose should resolve if prosecutors have sufficient proof to show there’s possible trigger for a defendant to face trial.

Prosecutors may search an indictment earlier than a grand jury, a transfer that limits what counterarguments protection attorneys can put forth and protects witnesses from cross-examination. In recent times, L.A. County prosecutors have convened grand juries to indict disgraced porn star Ron Jeremy on a litany of rape allegations and to evaluation manslaughter prices towards Torrance law enforcement officials.

Value appeared in court docket on Thursday morning to reply the 2 new prices filed towards him earlier this week. On Tuesday, Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Nathan Hochman mentioned that between 2019 and 2021, Value voted in help of grants and funding for L.A. Metro and the town’s housing authority after Richardson’s agency was paid greater than $800,000 mixed by each companies.

Joined by about two dozen supporters who sat within the again rows of the courtroom, Value pleaded not responsible to the brand new prices. His lawyer mentioned he would file a movement to dismiss these prices in a while Thursday.

Prosecutors mentioned the councilman’s employees “flagged the battle of curiosity previous to the votes” that prompted the brand new prices.

Value’s spokeswoman, Angelina Valencia, didn’t reply on to that allegation. However she mentioned the councilman’s workplace has all the time “carried out a multi-layered course of to determine and tackle potential conflicts of pursuits, work that’s extremely advanced and requires thorough evaluation.”

“Every month, our legislative staff opinions lots of of Council and Committee votes, cross-checking for potential conflicts,” she mentioned.

Schafler has repeatedly argued that Value didn’t knowingly violate battle of curiosity legal guidelines.