‘I’m a no’ – NBC Boston

She’s taking a victory lap for serving to do away with renter-paid dealer’s charges, however Gov. Maura Healey is in opposition to a possible 2026 poll query that may put a tough cap on annual hire will increase in Massachusetts.
Requested Tuesday by “Boston Public Radio” host Jim Braude about whether or not she’d assist the measure, Healey stated, “Look, I perceive the necessity, the curiosity in hire management, proper? I imply, it is why I’ve labored actually, actually exhausting, Jim, to construct as many homes as I can.”
Secretary of State Invoice Galvin’s workplace introduced on Thursday that it licensed 88,132 signatures for the petition, which supporters say will assist preserve the affordability disaster for tenants from getting even worse. The poll initiative proposes a restrict on annual hire will increase for many models to both the annual Shopper Value Index enhance or 5%, whichever is decrease. The measure would use the hire in place for anyone unit as of Jan. 31, 2026 because the baseline for future modifications.
Housing affordability has been a flashpoint in Massachusetts for years. In a marketing campaign e mail Tuesday, Healey listed a ban on renter-paid dealer’s charges as an accomplishment “to avoid wasting renters 1000’s” and stated her crew had launched 450 acres of surplus state land “to be developed into 1000’s of latest properties.”
Election 12 months is almost right here and Gov. Maura Healey is in search of a second time period in 2026, touting success on housing, well being care and a revitalized MBTA.
Healey on the radio pointed to a 220,000-unit housing scarcity Massachusetts confronted at first of her time within the nook workplace, and stated that the state has to date “began or constructed 100,000 properties.”
“We have got extra work to do, however I am making an attempt to do every part I can to drive down housing prices, which drives down housing costs, but in addition hire. My concern, , hire management is just not going to be the answer to how we get via this disaster. We have to construct extra properties,” Healey stated.
“I am a no, as a result of for those who take a look at the research — for those who take a look at the research, you successfully halt manufacturing. I’ll let you know that traders in housing have already pulled out of Massachusetts as a result of they’re involved about hire management,” Healey added.
A 1994 voter regulation banned hire management in Massachusetts and the idea has stalled on Beacon Hill for years, going through skepticism from prime Democrats and actual property pursuits. The 74,574-signature requirement for all poll measures derailed an effort two years in the past to position a neighborhood possibility hire management query on the 2024 poll. A committee referred to as “Housing for Massachusetts” filed this month to steer the opposition to the poll query.
“I do not need to see housing manufacturing stopped. We have to have housing manufacturing transfer ahead,” Healey stated. “I additionally perceive what’s driving hire management. I need to work collectively to do one thing that is smart, that creates extra properties, builds extra properties and lowers prices for folks.”
However hire management supporters level to the coverage as a approach to assist enhance housing stability, in addition to shield small landlords.
“We do perceive that housing prices and constructing housing is dear, however that doesn’t imply that we take away the accountability that builders and huge company landlords have round the place they’re constructing housing,” New England Neighborhood Undertaking Govt Director Noemi Ramos stated at a November rally. “We care about improvement coming into the neighborhood. We’re not anti-development, however we need to see stronger improvement with out displacement methods in place throughout the Commonwealth as new housing is being constructed.”
Hire management is considered one of 5 poll measures which were licensed to date this cycle. Extra certifications are anticipated quickly. Eligible petitions might be filed as payments by the primary legislative day of the brand new 12 months (Jan. 7). Lawmakers get an opportunity to deal with the petitions themselves, or let questions go earlier than voters in November.
Healey additionally stated Tuesday that she would assist a possible 2026 poll query backed by state Auditor Diana DiZoglio that may topic most data held by the Legislature and the governor’s workplace to the Massachusetts public data regulation.
“Yeah, I am going to vote sure,” Healey stated. “Offered there are specific exceptions that we have talked about up to now.”
Exemptions to current public data regulation embrace info associated to ongoing investigations or prosecutions, medical, well being and hospital data, post-mortem experiences, private figuring out info and extra.
The DiZoglio-backed query has not but been licensed by the secretary of state’s workplace, however DiZoglio reported that the marketing campaign submitted greater than 100,000 signatures.
Healey stated earlier this 12 months that she supported DiZoglio’s 2024 poll query to audit the Legislature, which handed simply. The hassle has fallen flat as prime legislative Democrats have resisted an audit, citing separation of powers and constitutional issues. If the brand new transparency measure have been to cross in 2026, “all of the issues that I have been requesting for the audit that they refuse to take part in would truly simply be made obtainable on to you, the voters of Massachusetts,” DiZoglio stated on the radio on Dec. 17.
“One thing that you just is perhaps fascinated with that is occurring within the State Home, that you just pay for, in these governing our bodies that you just fund together with your taxpayer {dollars} — you’d have the ability to get entry to these paperwork,” DiZoglio stated.
“We can’t hand over,” she added, when requested concerning the opposition to her transparency efforts on the State Home. “We can’t simply roll over and say ‘It is too exhausting. Let the people who find themselves undermining democracy run the state of Massachusetts. Let the authoritarian regime of the state Legislature win as a result of it is too exhausting and they will battle again.’ No. We have to get stronger.”
